←back to thread

247 points po | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.627s | source
1. whatever1 ◴[] No.43531883[source]
I mean if the air force is so uncomfortable with soldiers surviving while the $150M gadget bursts into flames, why do they even request for an ejection function in the aircrafts?
replies(2): >>43531939 #>>43532015 #
2. blatantly ◴[] No.43531939[source]
Cynical take would be it is a free soldier behind enemy lines.
replies(1): >>43532198 #
3. xlii ◴[] No.43532015[source]
Good PR I guess? Highest level specialists have demands. I fail to see how top pilots would agree to sit in suicide machines.

Article mention 1/10 critical failure rate (injuries or worse). I wonder how much of a push is made in this direction?

Given (implied in article) sentiment I wouldn’t be very surprised if stakeholders wouldn’t want ejection to be too safe.

4. guappa ◴[] No.43532198[source]
I sincerely have any doubt they will ever actually use one against a country that has any military capability, because of what the PR would be if it gets shot down.