←back to thread

567 points elvis70 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
metadat ◴[] No.43525239[source]
This looks nice and easy to use.

My hypothesis is today's "modern" OS user interfaces are objectively worse from a usability perspective, obfuscating key functionality behind layers of confusing menus.

It reminds me of these "OS popularity since the 70s" time lapse views:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=cTKhqtll5cQ

The dominance of Windows is crazy, even today, Mac desktops and laptops are comparatively niche

replies(16): >>43525330 #>>43525364 #>>43525525 #>>43525540 #>>43525588 #>>43525908 #>>43525913 #>>43526321 #>>43526344 #>>43526446 #>>43527011 #>>43527132 #>>43527202 #>>43528185 #>>43531771 #>>43536478 #
mananaysiempre ◴[] No.43525525[source]
> This looks nice

These kinds of things almost always give me an uncanny-valley feeling. Here I'm looking at the screenshot and can’t help noticing that the taskbar buttons are too close to the taskbar’s edge, the window titles are too narrow, the folders are too yellow, and so on and so forth. (To its credit, Wine is the one exception that is not susceptible to this, even when configured to use a higher DPI value so the proportions aren’t actually the ones I’m used to.) I’m not so much criticizing the theme’s authors as wondering why this is so universal across the many replicas.

replies(6): >>43525576 #>>43525662 #>>43526734 #>>43528453 #>>43528965 #>>43535412 #
goosedragons ◴[] No.43528965[source]
It can look better. This is basically a distro with Chicago95 out of the box and not well configured. If you take the time it can look more like 95. The Chicago95 screenshots IMO look better:

https://github.com/grassmunk/Chicago95

replies(1): >>43531663 #
1. int_19h ◴[] No.43531663[source]
Fonts make the biggest difference here. Tahoma would also be decent (if not quite right).