←back to thread

What to Do

(paulgraham.com)
274 points npalli | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.623s | source
Show context
mellosouls ◴[] No.43516079[source]

In lieu of explanation I'm guessing the flagging is knee-jerk anti-PG stuff.

Disappointing response.

replies(1): >>43516409 #
sidcool ◴[] No.43516409[source]

Why are people anti-PG?

replies(5): >>43517635 #>>43517728 #>>43526464 #>>43526926 #>>43551984 #
smt88[dead post] ◴[] No.43526464[source]

[flagged]

dang ◴[] No.43526549[source]

Regardless of whom you're putting down, how right you are, or feel you are, comments like this and >>43370236 → are badly against the site guidelines. Please don't post any more of these to HN.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

replies(2): >>43529517 #>>43552024 #
1. smt88 ◴[] No.43529517[source]

It should be acceptable to criticize rich, powerful people in unemotional terms, but I wasn't even doing that. I was summarizing the other comments on this thread.

Here are examples of comments (that remain visible) that I was summarizing:

- >>43515252 →

- >>43526888 →

- >>43527106 →

- >>43515723 →

In the future I can be more careful to say something like, "Based on the comments here, people are saying that he..." but I thought that was implied in my comment already.

replies(1): >>43531154 #
2. dang ◴[] No.43531154[source]

I'm sorry but to me at least, this was not clear in your comment at all.

Generally it's a good idea to explicitly disambiguate intent (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...).