←back to thread

567 points elvis70 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
metadat ◴[] No.43525239[source]
This looks nice and easy to use.

My hypothesis is today's "modern" OS user interfaces are objectively worse from a usability perspective, obfuscating key functionality behind layers of confusing menus.

It reminds me of these "OS popularity since the 70s" time lapse views:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=cTKhqtll5cQ

The dominance of Windows is crazy, even today, Mac desktops and laptops are comparatively niche

replies(16): >>43525330 #>>43525364 #>>43525525 #>>43525540 #>>43525588 #>>43525908 #>>43525913 #>>43526321 #>>43526344 #>>43526446 #>>43527011 #>>43527132 #>>43527202 #>>43528185 #>>43531771 #>>43536478 #
esafak ◴[] No.43525364[source]
Microsoft Windows programs hid functionality under layers of menus and the registry. MacOS, at least, surfaces much less functionality, because it offers sensible defaults. I never had to do anything akin to fiddling with the Windows Registry.

I did like some Windows things, though, like the ribbon, and reconfigurable UIs. Today's UIs are more immutable, for the worse.

replies(7): >>43525417 #>>43525437 #>>43525470 #>>43525533 #>>43525704 #>>43525732 #>>43526540 #
1. exiguus ◴[] No.43525732[source]
Selecting the appropriate tool for the task at hand is crucial, in my opinion. However, I believe the choice is often influenced by companies mandating the use of Microsoft and Mac systems due to cost and maintenance considerations, rather than allowing employees to choose between Mac, Windows, or Linux based on their preferences. Proprietary software that only runs on Mac or Windows, never was an argument, because you can just RDP stream remote desktop apps or use the browser.