←back to thread

Blue95: a desktop for your childhood home's computer room

(github.com)
567 points elvis70 | 3 comments | 30 Mar 25 15:30 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
metadat ◴[30 Mar 25 16:14 UTC] No.43525239[source]▶
This looks nice and easy to use.

My hypothesis is today's "modern" OS user interfaces are objectively worse from a usability perspective, obfuscating key functionality behind layers of confusing menus.

It reminds me of these "OS popularity since the 70s" time lapse views:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=cTKhqtll5cQ

The dominance of Windows is crazy, even today, Mac desktops and laptops are comparatively niche

replies(16): >>43525330 #>>43525364 #>>43525525 #>>43525540 #>>43525588 #>>43525908 #>>43525913 #>>43526321 #>>43526344 #>>43526446 #>>43527011 #>>43527132 #>>43527202 #>>43528185 #>>43531771 #>>43536478 #
voidfunc ◴[30 Mar 25 16:25 UTC] No.43525330[source]▶
I got in an argument with an accessibility engineer about this recently...

The whole UI as branding thing has utterly killed usability.

replies(6): >>43525352 #>>43525504 #>>43525627 #>>43526522 #>>43526880 #>>43527069 #
hyperbrainer ◴[30 Mar 25 16:45 UTC] No.43525504[source]▶
It's interesting especially because it seems like companies today pour tens of millions into "accessibility", but I never see a thing's usability in terms of simple and easy-to-do-what-I-want UX fall in to the same category.
replies(2): >>43525523 #>>43526096 #
1. rafram ◴[30 Mar 25 16:47 UTC] No.43525523[source]▶
One is required by law and/or contract terms, the other is just nice to have.
replies(1): >>43526870 #
2. layer8 ◴[30 Mar 25 19:35 UTC] No.43526870[source]▶
And that is why we can’t have nice things, apparently.
replies(1): >>43527930 #
3. ◴[30 Mar 25 21:42 UTC] No.43527930[source]▶