←back to thread

567 points elvis70 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
rbanffy ◴[] No.43525012[source]
How cute… imagine my childhood home would have a computer with a graphical desktop…

I feel so old now…

replies(2): >>43525268 #>>43526049 #
cmrdporcupine ◴[] No.43525268[source]
Yeah as far as GUIs go, Win95 isn't in the "nostalgia" category for me, I was already well into adulthood.

I kind of get the appeal, but it's also unnecessarily skeumorphic/fake-3d and there were some UX things that made little sense especially lumping all the window controls all together (including the destructive "close" X) where MacOS smartly separated them.

replies(3): >>43525327 #>>43525342 #>>43525411 #
mrweasel ◴[] No.43525342[source]
> where MacOS smartly separated them.

Interesting that modern macOS now have them next to each other, like Windows.

You'd be hard pressed to call the Window 95 UI pretty, but it is really functional. I'm still a firm believe that the majority of the work we do with computers today could be done within the Windows 95 shell. We need 64bit, more memory, faster CPUs, GPUs all that, but the modern UI aren't really "better", if anything many of them are more confusing. I think a lot of office works would be happy to just have kept the Window 95 era UI for Windows and Office.

replies(2): >>43525419 #>>43534382 #
rbanffy ◴[] No.43525419[source]
> You'd be hard pressed to call the Window 95 UI pretty, but it is really functional.

Ironically, the Windows 95 look seems a lot like a copy of the NeXT look, which is the OS all modern Macs are kind of running.

replies(2): >>43525489 #>>43527676 #
1. cmrdporcupine ◴[] No.43525489[source]
Yeah frankly I'd take the NeXT UI over any of them, including Mac OS X, which felt like a huge step backwards to me compared to NeXTstep

EDIT: Sun's OpenLook is the other one from that era that was fantastic