←back to thread

1195 points gniting | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.831s | source
Show context
dTal ◴[] No.43519791[source]

Another fantastic reason to strictly only install apps from F-Droid.

replies(2): >>43519959 #>>43521143 #
JohnFen ◴[] No.43519959[source]

How does that address the problem? Does F-Droid do some sort of additional screening to keep out apps that do this?

replies(2): >>43520038 #>>43520090 #
dandersch ◴[] No.43520090[source]

packages on f-droid list all required permissions explicitly, and the mentioned permission seems to be listed as "query all packages: Allows an app to see all installed packages.". It doesn't mark the app as having "anti-features", but you can at least make a more informed decision this way.

replies(2): >>43520186 #>>43521191 #
1. duskwuff ◴[] No.43521191[source]

> It doesn't mark the app as having "anti-features"

I suppose they must be too busy ticking off "anti-features" like "can communicate with non-Free services" to notice that sort of thing.

(No, really. F-Droid will tag applications like a Mastodon client as having "anti-feature: Non-Free Network Services", presumably because it can be configured to connect to servers running non-free software?)