←back to thread

268 points tech234a | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.25s | source
Show context
samiv ◴[] No.43513408[source]
I'm also 100% convinced Microsoft will introduce mandatory code signing at some point and make it so that you can only ever install software from Windows Store.

They are envious of the Google and Apple walled gardens/cashcows and are now determined to turn Windows into one.

Windows is no longer a product for users, the users of Windows are the product for Microsoft to be shoved into the Azure sales funnel.

replies(13): >>43513481 #>>43513509 #>>43513544 #>>43513761 #>>43513801 #>>43513860 #>>43514065 #>>43514218 #>>43514472 #>>43516006 #>>43516046 #>>43529439 #>>43529599 #
grishka ◴[] No.43514218[source]
Mandatory code signing is meaningless without secure boot though, which can't be made mandatory on x86 systems.
replies(4): >>43514480 #>>43514556 #>>43515221 #>>43516349 #
bitwize ◴[] No.43516349[source]
Who decided that secure boot can't be made mandatory on x86 systems?

Microsoft.

They can reverse their decision at any time. Inasmuch as you are able to boot Linux on your PC, it's only because Microsoft deigns to allow it.

replies(1): >>43517449 #
charcircuit ◴[] No.43517449[source]
>only because Microsoft deigns to allow it

Other operating systems could still collaborate with manufacturers to have their key be trusted.

replies(1): >>43519341 #
1. bitwize ◴[] No.43519341[source]
But manufacturers won't cooperate. One OEM (Asus?) once cited a price of like $16M to trust one key. The price for Microsoft is nothing because Microsoft can say "trust our keys or lose Windows certification".