←back to thread

267 points giuliomagnifico | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.614s | source
Show context
pmags ◴[] No.43517799[source]
I'm a US scientist and the use of minimalist phone and a laptop is something I'm planning for all my travel.

This is for the simple reason that I have determined, based on a large body of cases that are accumulating at a disturbing rate, that the current US administration considers themselves "above the law". Furthermore, the administration has shown that they are eager to carry out actions that violate due process and freedom of speech against anyone they perceive as opposing their policies/views.

EDIT: I'm happy to document such cases for those who have not been paying attention, but I also encourage those who are doubtful to simply search the many examples that have been posted here on HN (unfortunately, many flagged in an attempt to suppress discussion).

replies(6): >>43517821 #>>43517838 #>>43518113 #>>43518270 #>>43518508 #>>43522930 #
dataflow ◴[] No.43517821[source]
Do you not feel unsafe sharing this publicly?
replies(2): >>43517884 #>>43518331 #
godelski ◴[] No.43518331[source]

    First they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a socialist.
    Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a trade unionist.
    Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—because I was not a Jew.
    Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.

    —Martin Niemöller
At some point you have to be brave and face your fears. If you do not, then the light slowly dies and the darkness grows. By putting your head down and hiding you protect yourself but empower the very thing you are hiding from. It is a classic fallacy as you are taking short term rewards at a much higher cost in the long run. What you gain you borrow from the future, interest applies.

  However vast the darkness, we must supply our own light.
  - Stanley Kubrick
replies(1): >>43518456 #
dataflow ◴[] No.43518456[source]
The question wasn't about "speaking out", it was about publicly disclosing your own strategy. You can do one without the other.
replies(1): >>43518666 #
1. godelski ◴[] No.43518666[source]
What risk do they have sharing that strategy? It is an extremely basic and common strategy

  >>> the use of minimalist phone and a laptop is something I'm planning for all my travel
This is a strategy recommended to literally every employee that works at a national lab. Similarly to anyone who works with a security clearance, SBU (secure but unclassified) materials, or even ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) (which includes anyone that works in aerospace. A rocket or a jet is "missile technology")

I don't think their comment has any PII or even signals to adversaries how to fight back. It's just common for people to have lots of information. Sure, adversaries can press you about this but at that point they're probably going to press you for another reason anyways.

replies(1): >>43519805 #
2. dataflow ◴[] No.43519805[source]
> What risk do they have sharing that strategy? It is an extremely basic and common strategy

Do you also reveal your hand when playing card games? On the basis that the other players already know all the cards anyway?

replies(1): >>43521452 #
3. godelski ◴[] No.43521452[source]
My strategy is that I hold my cards to my vest. i.e. I take a small peak and then leave them on the table.

Having revealed my strategy for keeping you from seeing my cards, were you able to learn more about my cards after I have revealed my strategy for preventing you from seeing my cards? If so I'd like to learn. If not, then reread my previous comment.