←back to thread

267 points giuliomagnifico | 8 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source | bottom
Show context
pmags ◴[] No.43517799[source]
I'm a US scientist and the use of minimalist phone and a laptop is something I'm planning for all my travel.

This is for the simple reason that I have determined, based on a large body of cases that are accumulating at a disturbing rate, that the current US administration considers themselves "above the law". Furthermore, the administration has shown that they are eager to carry out actions that violate due process and freedom of speech against anyone they perceive as opposing their policies/views.

EDIT: I'm happy to document such cases for those who have not been paying attention, but I also encourage those who are doubtful to simply search the many examples that have been posted here on HN (unfortunately, many flagged in an attempt to suppress discussion).

replies(6): >>43517821 #>>43517838 #>>43518113 #>>43518270 #>>43518508 #>>43522930 #
dataflow ◴[] No.43517821[source]
Do you not feel unsafe sharing this publicly?
replies(2): >>43517884 #>>43518331 #
whatshisface ◴[] No.43517884[source]
That is not really relevant, because you sort of have to say what's true whatever happens to you, as required at the intersection of the duties of a scientist, of a citizen of a republic, and even on the basis of the basic tenants of the country's majority religion. In some sense to live a steady life you have to be resigned to potential misfortunes, even if you do not want them to happen to you.
replies(2): >>43518006 #>>43518059 #
roxolotl ◴[] No.43518006[source]
I’ve been struggling with this. I’ve recently started using a new handle as a way to distance myself a bit. I wouldn’t expect it to hold up under scrutiny though. And then I wonder about the moral obligation to say what is right. So is it worth, or even morally right, to create a new pseudoanoynomous identity?
replies(3): >>43518138 #>>43518171 #>>43518219 #
lantry ◴[] No.43518138[source]
It is easier to change your behavior, but it is better to change your government.
replies(2): >>43518229 #>>43518306 #
stevenAthompson ◴[] No.43518229[source]
We can not change the government without changing the people, and the people do not want to change.
replies(1): >>43518347 #
1. mfuzzey ◴[] No.43518347[source]
why? Serious question - as a European I'm really baffled by the US these days?
replies(3): >>43518519 #>>43518553 #>>43518646 #
2. stevenAthompson ◴[] No.43518519[source]
I can only speculate, but I suspect it's related to our infantilization. A proper democracy requires an informed and rational electorate, and we just don't have that.

As I said elsewhere in this post, most adults now read below the sixth grade level. Popular media has been getting shorter and shorter, all while relying less and less on the printed word. Meanwhile the most popular news sources are targeted to people with the comprehension and reading skills of children, and the most popular movies are literally based on children's comic books. Hell, video games outsell movies by an ever increasing margin and the majority of adults now find it impossible/unpleasant to sit through even an entire comic book film without checking their cell phones. Even music has become increasing simple and repetitive, designed not to challenge the listener. Our shared culture is almost entirely the culture of children.

So then, do we really expect these adult-sized children to be capable of facing down hard choices, or making rational informed decisions? No, they accept the "obvious" (but often incorrect) answers offered by charlatans and simpletons in lieu of genuine reason and the hard work of finding actual (and often painful) solutions for the very messy real world.

replies(1): >>43518772 #
3. giraffe_lady ◴[] No.43518553[source]
I don't mean this in a shitty way but how much of what you know about the US comes from recent (say last 40 years) media and culture sources?

Because if you read into its history, I mean we started with a genocide and chattel slavery. Then created & implemented an entirely novel and comprehensive social-legal framework to justify and manage an apartheid society for another few generations. Lynching was a beloved public spectacle just a century ago. Hitler & Hendrik Verwoerd looked to us for inspiration.

I'm american and not particularly an america-hater overall, I could create an equivalent list of positive things we've accomplished. But both are true, and the above are facts. What's happening now has always been part of our country too. We have never really reckoned with this, and it will keep coming back until we do.

4. whatshisface ◴[] No.43518646[source]
One of the biggest signs that nobody knows was the difficulty of predicting the outcome of the past election.
5. masfuerte ◴[] No.43518772[source]
I find it unpleasant to sit through an entire comic book film. The problem is not my attention span.
replies(1): >>43523656 #
6. ndsipa_pomu ◴[] No.43523656{3}[source]
I don't think it's fair to characterise all "comic book" films as being immature, although there's a lot of shallow super-hero films being pumped out of Hollywood these days. Maybe if more people in the U.S. were familiar with "V For Vendetta" (despite Alan Moore's loathing for that film) then their attitude towards government might well be different.

(Trying to think of another good example and the Watchmen series tackled racism head-on, also Persepolis is a great animation covering the Iranian revolution)

replies(1): >>43525155 #
7. SauciestGNU ◴[] No.43525155{4}[source]
The problem with "cape shit" is explicitly Disney. They sacrifice the last vestiges of art and integrity to keep the pipeline full of slop that happens to be easily digestible to those people who read at or below a primary school level.
replies(1): >>43525367 #
8. ndsipa_pomu ◴[] No.43525367{5}[source]
Yes, although I am currently enjoying Daredevil: Born Again. Also, I thought that Andor was a superb series.