←back to thread

267 points giuliomagnifico | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.62s | source
Show context
renewiltord ◴[] No.43517794[source]
The people opposing these things do themselves a serious disservice by conflating someone who attended the funeral of the top guy of a designated terrorist group with the biologist moving biomaterial between research labs.

Now every time I hear one of these stories I’m just waiting for the other shoe to drop and hear about how the frog biologist attended Prigozhin’s funeral (purely out of recognition for his work as a chef, of course)

replies(5): >>43517817 #>>43517857 #>>43517872 #>>43518035 #>>43518162 #
whatshisface ◴[] No.43517817[source]
There are in reality only two types of actions, those that are illegal, and those that you think you have every right to do.
replies(2): >>43517854 #>>43517888 #
1. renewiltord ◴[] No.43517888[source]
Fair enough, the government has every right to deport the frog biologist. It’s not illegal for them to do so. Regardless, I think they should not have.
replies(1): >>43518525 #
2. selimthegrim ◴[] No.43518525[source]
I must’ve missed all the people we deported for attending IRA funerals.
replies(1): >>43524736 #
3. renewiltord ◴[] No.43524736[source]
Personally, I prefer that we are not consistent with three decades past. Gay marriage wasn’t recognized back then and so on. So I’m not surprised we’re inconsistent with that time. Over the period of one or two admins I prefer some degree of consistency but over three decades? Not so much.

If we had back then it wouldn’t have struck me as crazy if we’d considered the IRA a terrorist group. That we didn’t do this doesn’t mean we’re locked out of it forever.