←back to thread

219 points helloworld | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.321s | source
Show context
zfg ◴[] No.43511459[source]
[flagged]
replies(3): >>43511811 #>>43512167 #>>43513702 #
Jiro ◴[] No.43513702[source]
I seem to recall that when conservatives were getting banned from social media (or any place else), the prevailing attitude was "it's a private company, and they don't owe you anything, so they can ban someone for any reason they want." Now when it's a sympathetic target suddenly nobody is saying that? People are even invoking the First Amendment, which was laughed at back then.
replies(2): >>43514764 #>>43516820 #
1. thrance ◴[] No.43516820[source]
The difference is conservatives voices were always the ones getting the most exposure online. Their whining back then was purely political and completely unfounded. And now that they're in power and actively censoring people, it should be apparent to all how this constant appeal to free speech and the 1st amendment was deeply hypocritical.