←back to thread

What to Do

(paulgraham.com)
274 points npalli | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.258s | source
Show context
Madmallard ◴[] No.43515289[source]
I personally don't think technology for the most part is good for society. It makes nature boring and predictable and life less interesting as a whole if this is true, but I don't think we even understand the degree to which technology is just ruining life for the future. We don't have adaptations to deal with anything and adaptations take tens of thousands of years if not way more to occur. The romantic thought is that technology can help us solve the problems that come up as a result of itself, but I'm less optimistic there just because of how things have been going. It seems like human nature and us not being good at understanding large complex systems as a species results in the malignant actors and developments taking root and metastasizing over time.

- global warming - antibiotic resistance - environmental contamination - food quality diminishing - explosive increase in chronic disease, especially in young people - extinction of most other species - fertility problems - declining birth rates - poly-pharmacy becoming normal - now things related to energy consumption with AI and cryptocurrency - huge decline in social behaviors across the population

Just seems like for every new advancement we're making new chronic issues that are barely incentivized at all for being managed and alleviated

replies(3): >>43515379 #>>43515436 #>>43516652 #
1. risyachka ◴[] No.43516652[source]
The issue is not technology but how and where it is applied.

Tens and tens of billions are spent to generate cute pics instead of same tech applied to radiology, diseases cure, etc.