←back to thread

What to Do

(paulgraham.com)
274 points npalli | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.204s | source
1. hsshhshshjk ◴[] No.43515485[source]
Is making music something "good and new"? Art?
replies(3): >>43526200 #>>43526684 #>>43532559 #
2. sctb ◴[] No.43526200[source]
Explicitly yes:

> I mean new things in a very general sense. Newton's physics was a good new thing. Indeed, the first version of this principle was to have good new ideas. But that didn't seem general enough: it didn't include making art or music, for example, except insofar as they embody new ideas.

3. ◴[] No.43526684[source]
4. thinkingemote ◴[] No.43532559[source]
Art should be, yes. Unfortunately a lot of visual art being produced from art schools and shown in museums / galleries are forms of criticism. The article mentions crticism as not being a good new thing. The message they seek to convey is more of a priority than the creation of a Good Thing. (In reality modern art is a mixture of varying degrees of criticism and creation)

This is partly because modern conceptual art is about concepts so it's very easy for it to be overtaken by a political or critical message as the concept.