←back to thread

219 points helloworld | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.463s | source
Show context
zfg ◴[] No.43511459[source]
[flagged]
replies(3): >>43511811 #>>43512167 #>>43513702 #
Jiro ◴[] No.43513702[source]
I seem to recall that when conservatives were getting banned from social media (or any place else), the prevailing attitude was "it's a private company, and they don't owe you anything, so they can ban someone for any reason they want." Now when it's a sympathetic target suddenly nobody is saying that? People are even invoking the First Amendment, which was laughed at back then.
replies(2): >>43514764 #>>43516820 #
1. harimau777 ◴[] No.43514764[source]
The difference is that conservatives generally get banned for being disrespectful and hateful. E.g. conservatives generally don't get banned for saying that they disagree with gay marriage, they get banned for using slurs, insulting people, etc.