As tossandthrow says, return it as being defect. Reckon this should apply anywhere where warranty applies.
If what you say is correct then the device is (a) not fit for purpose and (b) it's possible you may be able to claim damages on the basis that the manufacturer has changed its modus operandi without your permission or consent and it's now incompatible with the way you work, etc., etc.
If Google reckons it had the right to alter your device because you agreed to its EULA, then it seems you'd still have a case on grounds that it no longer functions as it should.
There are only two things that will stop these bastards—them realizing such behavior is draining money from their hip pockets and proper consumer and privacy legislation.
But forget the latter, democracy is stuffed, and Big Tech has it by the balls anyway.
replies(2):