←back to thread

Cross-Platform P2P Wi-Fi: How the EU Killed AWDL

(www.ditto.com)
223 points stusmall | 4 comments | 28 Mar 25 13:13 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
mschuster91 ◴[28 Mar 25 14:07 UTC] No.43505607[source]▶
The interesting question is authentication/authorization - at the moment, macOS greatly simplifies this as long as both devices belong to the same Apple ID. On the opposite side, Samsung does the same.

How will that work out?

replies(3): >>43505810 #>>43506001 #>>43506685 #
lxgr ◴[28 Mar 25 15:30 UTC] No.43506685[source]▶
That's certainly a nice feature, but in comparison to the elephant in the room, i.e. wireless file transfers between Android and iOS being completely impossible at the moment, it's completely insignificant.
replies(2): >>43507488 #>>43511001 #
1. dmitrygr ◴[28 Mar 25 23:27 UTC] No.43511001[source]▶
Nice of you to state your option as fact. Now let me try. Compat with Android is “completely insignificant” but magical auto-auth based on Apple ID is the “elephant in the room”. See how that works?
replies(1): >>43512344 #
2. lxgr ◴[29 Mar 25 03:02 UTC] No.43512344[source]▶
I meant the opposite: Cross-platform compatibility is what’s sorely missing, and authentication is only a cherry on top, so I don’t think it ought to be a blocker.
replies(1): >>43512460 #
3. dmitrygr ◴[29 Mar 25 03:25 UTC] No.43512460[source]▶
The reason iMessage has less spam than SMS is that it has a cost associated: the cost of an apple device. It is our gated community and we do not want it force-opened to the public. Better?
replies(1): >>43512598 #
4. lxgr ◴[29 Mar 25 03:57 UTC] No.43512598{3}[source]▶
Not sure if you’re being ironic, but I use an iPhone too (and as such “own property in the gated community”), and I very much do want iMessage force-opened to the public if that’s what it takes to get Apple to make it interoperable.

Compared to a decade ago or two, there are too many silos in communication these days as it is.