It's there some way to control what gets updated in the database and how and when?
For example I'd like to be in control of the archtectural patterns and not let the LLM drive this.
replies(1):
Before this integration, Cursor (an AI-assisted IDE many of us already use daily) lacked a robust way to persist user context. To solve this, I used Graphiti’s Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, which allows structured data exchange between the IDE and Graphiti's temporal knowledge graph.
Key points of how this works:
- Custom entities like 'Requirement', 'Preference', and 'Procedure' precisely capture coding standards and project specs.
- Real-time updates let Cursor adapt instantly—if you change frameworks or update standards, the memory updates immediately.
- Persistent retrieval ensures Cursor always recalls your latest preferences and project decisions, across new agent sessions, projects, and even after restarting the IDE.
I’d love your feedback—particularly on the approach and how it fits your workflow.
Here's a detailed write-up: https://www.getzep.com/blog/cursor-adding-memory-with-graphi...
GitHub Repo: https://github.com/getzep/graphiti
-Daniel
For example I'd like to be in control of the archtectural patterns and not let the LLM drive this.
For example ("architecture pattern" - auch as the dependency rule from clean architecture, "development areas" such as frontend, backend)