←back to thread

650 points Stratoscope | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Starlevel004 ◴[] No.43498765[source]
I refuse to care about this. A single dash is all I will ever use. I see no possible reason to use the other two.
replies(13): >>43498913 #>>43499001 #>>43499172 #>>43499782 #>>43500834 #>>43500943 #>>43501907 #>>43503357 #>>43504331 #>>43505366 #>>43506816 #>>43506857 #>>43509215 #
theelous3 ◴[] No.43498913[source]
Throwing my hat in here. The sub millimeter difference in the length of a dash conveys no additional meaning or clarity. It is impossible to argue me out of this position.

It's not like you can reliably write these consistently by hand either without going over the top in length to make it extremely obvious.

replies(4): >>43499031 #>>43500614 #>>43504280 #>>43506293 #
MindBeams ◴[] No.43504280[source]
This sort of anti-intellectualism is the perfect antidote for those who claim that improper grammar is nothing more than evidence of language "evolving."
replies(2): >>43506004 #>>43509866 #
1. Aardwolf ◴[] No.43506004{3}[source]
I think many grammar rules are not intellectual but just randomly evolved conventions.

E.g. some English language rule says that a comma or ending period of a non-quoted sentence goes inside the quotes if there's something quoted at the end of that sentence. That rule feels anti-intellectual to me, as if there's some misunderstanding of how hierarchical placement in one-dimensional space works (since something that's not being quoted is being put inside quotes)

replies(2): >>43508838 #>>43509577 #
2. NegativeLatency ◴[] No.43508838[source]
Spelling used to be more fluid and up to the writer/printer. Printers would also use different spellings as a mechanism to change the line width and otherwise format text to their liking.

https://www.ruf.rice.edu/~kemmer/Histengl/spelling.html

3. milesrout ◴[] No.43509577[source]
That "rule" is the rule in America but not elsewhere. Please break it. It is stupid.