←back to thread

650 points Stratoscope | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.355s | source
Show context
mmooss ◴[] No.43499567[source]
Here's an easy, if not always precise way to remember:

* Hyphens connect things, such as compound words: double-decker, cut-and-dried, 212-555-5555.

* EN dashes make a range between things: Boston–San Francisco flight, 10–20 years: both connect not only the endpoints, but define that all the space between is included. (Compare the last usage with the phone number example under Hyphens.)

* EM dashes break things, such as sentences or thoughts: 'What the—!'; A paragraph should express one idea—but rules are made to be broken.

Unicode has the original ASCII hyphen-minus (U+002d), as well as a dedicated hyphen (U+2010), other functional hyphens such as soft and non-breaking hyphens, and a dedicated minus sign (U+2212), and some variations of minus such as subscript, superscript, etc.

There's also the figure dash "‒" (U+2012), essentally a hyphen-minus that's the same width as numbers and used aesthetically for typsetting, afaik. And don't overlook two-em-dashes "⸺" and three-em-dashes "⸻" and horizontal bars "―", the latter used like quotation marks!

replies(12): >>43499795 #>>43500096 #>>43500276 #>>43500389 #>>43500958 #>>43501074 #>>43502495 #>>43503176 #>>43504564 #>>43507109 #>>43512927 #>>43570687 #
energy123 ◴[] No.43500389[source]
The em dash is now a GPT-ism and is not advisable unless you want people to think your writing is the output of a LLM.
replies(9): >>43500409 #>>43500523 #>>43500587 #>>43500833 #>>43501522 #>>43501593 #>>43503214 #>>43505661 #>>43506613 #
phlakaton ◴[] No.43501593[source]
Emily Dickinson wept—
replies(2): >>43501790 #>>43509965 #
mmooss ◴[] No.43501790[source]
Ha, good point, and an interesting question: What kinds of dashes did Dickinson intend?

It's a hard one to answer: We could look at published Emily Dickinson books from the time, but did Dickinson really pay that close attention to or have that much control over the type?

We could look at Dickinson's actual personal documents, but if they were handewritten, distinguishing dashes could be difficult even if there was intention there.

replies(2): >>43503234 #>>43504268 #
armedgorilla ◴[] No.43504268[source]
Fortunately we have troves of her handwritten documents; all of her poems were first printed posthumously. To me, she's using the punctuation as pacing or tonal markers as opposed to ligatures ("I'll clutch— and clutch— " vs "I'll clutch-and clutch-"). Many publishers style these marks as longer than normal m-dashes for that reason, which makes sense seeing as they are rarely used as asides.

I interpret her marks—

as breathless pauses—

that— having no unicode—

should be given to m—

and space—

https://www.edickinson.org/editions/2/image_sets/12170035

replies(2): >>43504529 #>>43508877 #
1. phlakaton ◴[] No.43504529[source]
Em-dashes have been the norm in every Dickinson poem I read, and I think it might have derived from the preferences of Victorian publishers, who I understand loved those long dashes.