←back to thread

650 points Stratoscope | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.893s | source
Show context
Starlevel004 ◴[] No.43498765[source]
I refuse to care about this. A single dash is all I will ever use. I see no possible reason to use the other two.
replies(13): >>43498913 #>>43499001 #>>43499172 #>>43499782 #>>43500834 #>>43500943 #>>43501907 #>>43503357 #>>43504331 #>>43505366 #>>43506816 #>>43506857 #>>43509215 #
1. grey413 ◴[] No.43503357[source]
En dashes, I'll grant you, are pointless. Those can go away.

However, em dashes are a different case. The main reason why it's desirable to use em dashes (beside convention) is for clarity of purpose. The hyphen is already a very overloaded character; they're extensively used to denote ranges and link compound words. Importantly, both of those usages do not correspond to pauses in spoken language. If you're voicing a hyphen you're supposed to barrel on through it. An em dash is much closer to a parenthesis, comma, or semicolon. It's a meaningful break in the sentence, in the way that a hyphen isn't.

Now, if it were up to me I'd choose a different character to replace em dashes (maybe underscores), but that's a separate argument.

replies(1): >>43505885 #
2. krupan ◴[] No.43505885[source]
Just use two dashes. Or like you said, use parentheses, commas, or semi-colons
replies(1): >>43507063 #
3. grey413 ◴[] No.43507063[source]
Two dashes are fine, the other options have different literary functions than em dashes, and shouldn't generally be used as replacements.