←back to thread

479 points jgruber | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.019s | source
Show context
e_ ◴[] No.43489594[source]
I suspect it may be a mix of various factors:

1. The HN audience’s preferences have changed over time

2. There’s way more competition – the amount of great content to share and discuss has increased a lot

3. Gruber apparently does not write as much or as well as he did a decade or so ago (at least according to many Daring Fireball readers I know)

4. Yes, many readers don’t like him, but I would also say that many readers, especially younger ones, simply don’t care about him (related to point number 1)

5. Related to all above, Gruber’s influence and relevance in tech debates have probably declined

replies(1): >>43489850 #
jgruber ◴[] No.43489850[source]
So you think I was consistently at #3 “as much and as well” from 2007-2021, and declined to #72 “as much and as well” quality in the last 4 years?
replies(2): >>43494479 #>>43496369 #
1. JKCalhoun ◴[] No.43494479[source]
If you discard that point (and it is a very subjective one and so easy to discard) there are still four other points that might have some weight.
replies(1): >>43496445 #
2. KerrAvon ◴[] No.43496445[source]
Are they? I mean, none of them are very objective.

Except that #5 is objectively not true. Apple execs pay attention to DaringFireball. What he posts matters for that reason alone.