←back to thread

395 points vinnyglennon | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.813s | source
Show context
tarkin2[dead post] ◴[] No.43489951[source]
[flagged]
1. throwaway2037 ◴[] No.43491316[source]
Small? Not at all.

Google tells me:

    Botswana, with an area of 581,730 square kilometers, is roughly the size of France or Texas, and slightly larger than the combined area of the UK and Ireland.
replies(2): >>43491712 #>>43492783 #
2. markdown ◴[] No.43491712[source]
Don't blame them for the assumption based on 450 years with the mercator projection that makes USA and European nations look bigger than they are and African nations look smaller than they are.
3. loudmax ◴[] No.43492783[source]
But with a population of 2.7 million. That is the more relevant factor here, and by this metric they're on the side of tiny.

And that makes their ability to develop a functioning satellite that integrates into a launch vehicle all the more impressive! Kudos to Botswana's engineers.

replies(1): >>43496386 #
4. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.43496386[source]
> And that makes their ability to develop a functioning satellite that integrates into a launch vehicle all the more impressive! Kudos to Botswana's engineers.

I'd like to say that but I don't think it's accurate. Endurosat handled at least the baseline functionality and launch vehicle integration.