←back to thread

395 points vinnyglennon | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.376s | source
Show context
echoangle ◴[] No.43485519[source]
Don’t want to belittle the achievement but they launched it as in „had it launched by the commercial launch provider SpaceX“, not on a self-developed rocket as it sounds like on the first read.
replies(10): >>43486164 #>>43486176 #>>43486389 #>>43486503 #>>43487344 #>>43488249 #>>43488350 #>>43489132 #>>43490828 #>>43494066 #
parsimo2010 ◴[] No.43486503[source]
Very few organizations and even countries can develop both a launch vehicle and a satellite. Botswana has done fine to develop a satellite that integrates onto a rideshare launch. They aren't working with anything close to the headcount or budget of NASA or even the ESA.

Edit (rather than reply and make the comment chain long): It's fine that you read it that way. I figure that if the article were about a launch vehicle then it would have been the rocket's name in the title, and if the article were about the satellite then it would have the satellite's name (BOTSAT-1). If Botswana had developed both an orbital launch vehicle and their first satellite then I'd bet the headline would have been sensational.

replies(7): >>43486541 #>>43486619 #>>43486769 #>>43487047 #>>43487902 #>>43488229 #>>43490087 #
aravindputrevu ◴[] No.43488229[source]
So true. I think most people don't realise how hard it is really to build a engine that works.
replies(1): >>43490995 #
1. ◴[] No.43490995[source]