←back to thread

764 points bertman | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jcmfernandes ◴[] No.43485833[source]
Insane effort. This sounded like a pipe dream just a couple of years ago. Congrats to everyone involved, especially to those who drove the effort.
replies(1): >>43487674 #
Joel_Mckay ◴[] No.43487674[source]
The Debian group is admirable, and have positively changed the standards for OS design several times. Reminds me I should donate to their coffee fund around tax time =3
replies(2): >>43489910 #>>43497816 #
alfiedotwtf ◴[] No.43489910[source]
Exactly!

I’ve said it many times and I’ll repeat it here - Debian will be one of the few Linux distros we have right now, that will still exist 100 years from now.

Yea, it’s not as modern in terms of versioning and risk compared to the likes of Arch, but that’s also a feature!

replies(3): >>43490181 #>>43490648 #>>43491565 #
1. walrus01 ◴[] No.43490648{3}[source]
It's quite easy to run Debian unstable (sid) if you want a more risky approach to having the newest of every package.
replies(1): >>43491143 #
2. cess11 ◴[] No.43491143[source]
Commonly these days you can also add specific repos for the things you want to be more on the edge. Then there are some tools one might install manually, at the moment I remember doing it with fzf.
replies(2): >>43493068 #>>43495937 #
3. sgarland ◴[] No.43493068[source]
Yep, I do this for a few tools. Though apt-key deprecation still hasn’t been universally accepted, so that’s always a minor annoyance to deal with.
4. presbyterian ◴[] No.43495937[source]
Flatpak is also a great option for apps you might want to be more up-to-date than Debian provides in their package manager.