←back to thread

Waymos crash less than human drivers

(www.understandingai.org)
345 points rbanffy | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.873s | source
Show context
mjburgess ◴[] No.43487426[source]
Waymos choose the routes, right?

The issue with self-driving is (1) how it generalises across novel environments without "highly-available route data" and provider-chosen routes; (2) how failures are correlated across machines.

In safe driving failures are uncorrelated and safety procedures generalise. We do not yet know if, say, using self-driving very widely will lead to conditions in which "in a few incidents" more people are killed in those incidents than were ever hypothetically saved.

Here, without any confidence intervals, we're told we've saved ~70 airbag incidents in 20 mil miles. A bad update to the fleet will easily eclipse that impact.

replies(13): >>43487464 #>>43487477 #>>43487508 #>>43487579 #>>43487600 #>>43487603 #>>43487655 #>>43487741 #>>43487758 #>>43487777 #>>43489023 #>>43491131 #>>43491352 #
ogogmad ◴[] No.43487758[source]
> In safe driving failures are uncorrelated and safety procedures generalise. We do not yet know if, say, using self-driving very widely will lead to conditions in which "in a few incidents" more people are killed in those incidents than were ever hypothetically saved.

Can you provide some examples of what you mean?

replies(1): >>43490615 #
1. im3w1l ◴[] No.43490615[source]
Volcanic eruption filling the atmosphere with ash. Acts of war or terrorism. Could be physical or cyberattack.
replies(1): >>43492753 #
2. ogogmad ◴[] No.43492753[source]
The only way for this to cause tens of thousands of death by self-driving alone is for people to suddenly need to drive the cars themselves, and not being able to do it well. Unless I'm missing something.
replies(1): >>43495520 #
3. im3w1l ◴[] No.43495520[source]
The system could go haywire and crash in such unexpected circumstances. They might also not. It's hard to know how they will behave.