←back to thread

388 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bryanlarsen ◴[] No.43485099[source]
At least for the moment, AI still needs knowledge workers to spec and prompt and check. AI makes knowledge workers more productive, but it doesn't eliminate the need for them.

And if knowledge workers are more productive, then knowledge work is cheaper. Cheaper knowledge work increases demand for knowledge work. So the number of workers required might actually increase. It also might not, but first order analysis that assumes decreased knowledge workers is not sufficient.

C.f. garment makers. Partial automation of clothes making made clothes cheaper, so now people have closets full of hundreds of garments rather than the 2 sets our great-grandparents likely had. There are now more people making garments now than there was 100 years ago.

replies(6): >>43485195 #>>43485628 #>>43487017 #>>43490017 #>>43490241 #>>43492628 #
MoonGhost ◴[] No.43487017[source]
According to this cheap food is good because people just start eating more. Actually cheap imports can be really bad for local businesses.

Now imagine dystopian world where AI can solve most data / engineering / science problems for cheap. Or even for free, just ask.

replies(2): >>43488118 #>>43488275 #
zombiwoof ◴[] No.43488275[source]
Free after it took a trillion in energy to train
replies(1): >>43488385 #
mystified5016 ◴[] No.43488385[source]
How much time, energy, and resources went into developing your language of choice? How much datacenter energy is burned recompiling GCC every night for the last 30 years?
replies(2): >>43488693 #>>43493955 #
1. Chaosvex ◴[] No.43488693{3}[source]
Comparatively little, I'd imagine.