←back to thread

388 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
bryanlarsen ◴[] No.43485099[source]
At least for the moment, AI still needs knowledge workers to spec and prompt and check. AI makes knowledge workers more productive, but it doesn't eliminate the need for them.

And if knowledge workers are more productive, then knowledge work is cheaper. Cheaper knowledge work increases demand for knowledge work. So the number of workers required might actually increase. It also might not, but first order analysis that assumes decreased knowledge workers is not sufficient.

C.f. garment makers. Partial automation of clothes making made clothes cheaper, so now people have closets full of hundreds of garments rather than the 2 sets our great-grandparents likely had. There are now more people making garments now than there was 100 years ago.

replies(6): >>43485195 #>>43485628 #>>43487017 #>>43490017 #>>43490241 #>>43492628 #
bitxbitxbitcoin ◴[] No.43485195[source]
I wonder how the ratio of people making garments relative to the total world population has changed though in this example.
replies(2): >>43485267 #>>43485288 #
bryanlarsen ◴[] No.43485267[source]
No easy answer since most garments > 100 years ago were home-made. But I can confidently assert without data that the number of man-hours of labor in the average closet is substantially up.

garment makers chosen because of this recent discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43450515

replies(2): >>43486897 #>>43488125 #
1. watwut ◴[] No.43488125[source]
100 years ago is 1925 - people were already buying cloth in stores at that time. You need to go further into history.