←back to thread

395 points vinnyglennon | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
echoangle ◴[] No.43485519[source]
Don’t want to belittle the achievement but they launched it as in „had it launched by the commercial launch provider SpaceX“, not on a self-developed rocket as it sounds like on the first read.
replies(10): >>43486164 #>>43486176 #>>43486389 #>>43486503 #>>43487344 #>>43488249 #>>43488350 #>>43489132 #>>43490828 #>>43494066 #
parsimo2010 ◴[] No.43486503[source]
Very few organizations and even countries can develop both a launch vehicle and a satellite. Botswana has done fine to develop a satellite that integrates onto a rideshare launch. They aren't working with anything close to the headcount or budget of NASA or even the ESA.

Edit (rather than reply and make the comment chain long): It's fine that you read it that way. I figure that if the article were about a launch vehicle then it would have been the rocket's name in the title, and if the article were about the satellite then it would have the satellite's name (BOTSAT-1). If Botswana had developed both an orbital launch vehicle and their first satellite then I'd bet the headline would have been sensational.

replies(7): >>43486541 #>>43486619 #>>43486769 #>>43487047 #>>43487902 #>>43488229 #>>43490087 #
closewith ◴[] No.43486619[source]
That seems an uncharitable read of the GP. I too assumed from the headline that by using the verb launch, it was referring to an indigenous vehicle.
replies(1): >>43487444 #
1. tonyhart7 ◴[] No.43487444[source]
we talking about Botswana here, not disrespect to botswana but you can't launch rocket with some serious publication first

we know that china would have rocket back then because scientific advancement, you cant skip steps