←back to thread

Arc-AGI-2 and ARC Prize 2025

(arcprize.org)
188 points gkamradt | 2 comments | 24 Mar 25 20:35 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
artificialprint ◴[24 Mar 25 22:00 UTC] No.43465860[source]▶
Oh boy! Some of these tasks are not hard, but require full attention and a lot of counting just to get things right! ARC3 will go 3D perhaps? JK

Congrats on launch, lets see how long it'll take to get saturated

replies(2): >>43465929 #>>43466945 #
fchollet ◴[24 Mar 25 22:09 UTC] No.43465929[source]▶
ARC 3 is still spatially 2D, but it adds a time dimension, and it's interactive.
replies(3): >>43466406 #>>43466916 #>>43466966 #
artninja1988 ◴[24 Mar 25 23:14 UTC] No.43466406[source]▶
I think a lot of people got discouraged, seeing how openai solved arc agi 1 by what seems like brute forcing and throwing money at it. Do you believe arc was solved in the "spirit" of the challenge? Also all the open sourced solutions seem super specific to solving arc. Is this really leading us to human level AI at open ended tasks?
replies(2): >>43466887 #>>43467745 #
1. mrshadowgoose ◴[25 Mar 25 03:03 UTC] No.43467745[source]▶
Strong emphasis on "seems".

I'd encourage you to review the definition of "brute force", and then consider the absolutely immense combinatoric space represented by the grids these puzzles use.

"Brute force" simply cannot touch these puzzles. An amount of understanding and pattern recognition is strictly required, even with the large quantities of test-time compute that were used against arc-agi-1.

replies(1): >>43469429 #
2. Davidzheng ◴[25 Mar 25 09:35 UTC] No.43469429[source]▶
Also there's no clear way to verify the solution. There could be easily multiple rules which works on the same examples