←back to thread

Zlib-rs is faster than C

(trifectatech.org)
341 points dochtman | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
johnisgood ◴[] No.43381735[source]
"faster than C" almost always boils down to different designs, implementations, algorithms, etc.

Perhaps it is faster than already-existing implementations, sure, but not "faster than C", and it is odd to make such claims.

replies(10): >>43381810 #>>43381813 #>>43381820 #>>43381959 #>>43382108 #>>43382124 #>>43382267 #>>43385171 #>>43386202 #>>43392542 #
layer8 ◴[] No.43382267[source]
If anything, this should be “zlib-rs is faster than zlib-ng”, but not “$library is faster than $programming_language”.
replies(1): >>43382768 #
chjj[dead post] ◴[] No.43382768[source]
[flagged]
pdimitar ◴[] No.43383969[source]
I am hopping on Rust threads on HN very regularly and I have to tell you my anecdotal experience.

Which is: people complaining about Rust zealots are much more than actual Rust zealots. Thinking of it, I haven't seen a proper Rust zealot on HN for at least a year at this point.

So I don't know, maybe do less cheap digs. Tearing down straw men is pretty boring to watch.

replies(3): >>43385343 #>>43385702 #>>43388717 #
hyperbrainer ◴[] No.43385702[source]
It is not limited to rust zealots or whatever. I have seen this phenomenon of people criticising a certain category for doing something in the comment section on reddit/youtube, but never actually seen the people doing that thing, even browsing the most heavily downvoted comments. Some weird group mentality victimisation.
replies(2): >>43385911 #>>43386274 #
chjj ◴[] No.43386274[source]
> never actually seen the people doing that thing

I'm happy to share then. Here's my most recent encounter with a rustacean: https://x.com/_chjj/status/1829989494298460636

I asked if he/she/they had ever used the unsafe keyword. That was the response I got. It's usually some vile insult involving furry or transgender genitalia.

replies(2): >>43387891 #>>43389997 #
hyperbrainer ◴[] No.43389997[source]
Honestly, that website is so far off the end of the sanity meter that I don't know what to say. Technically, you are right in that counterexamples exist. But on platforms like HN/techincal subreddits etc., never seen it myself, suggesting the problem is far less widespread than one might be initially moved to assume.
replies(1): >>43394460 #
1. pdimitar ◴[] No.43394460[source]
Yeah, same. Pointing at some loonie on Twitter who would be flagged out of existence here on HN is not an honest argument in the direction of "look, Rust fans are zealots!".

I mean, by that logic, people of my nationality would have to be fenced off and never allowed in other countries... because we do indeed have thousands of nasty scammers out there in the world.

99.99999% of us are chill, work, pay taxes, have fun etc.

So generalizations like the one that moved me to start pursuing the guy and not leave him alone until he ultimately said "it's just my anecdotal experience" (and stopped claiming it's universally true), because you know, we can pick ANY group, find several lunatics and claim the group is bad in this or that way.

As said to another guy a few minutes ago -- I can get such "opinions" in every bar. I come to HN for better discussions than this.