←back to thread

Zlib-rs is faster than C

(trifectatech.org)
341 points dochtman | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.21s | source
Show context
johnisgood ◴[] No.43381735[source]
"faster than C" almost always boils down to different designs, implementations, algorithms, etc.

Perhaps it is faster than already-existing implementations, sure, but not "faster than C", and it is odd to make such claims.

replies(10): >>43381810 #>>43381813 #>>43381820 #>>43381959 #>>43382108 #>>43382124 #>>43382267 #>>43385171 #>>43386202 #>>43392542 #
layer8 ◴[] No.43382267[source]
If anything, this should be “zlib-rs is faster than zlib-ng”, but not “$library is faster than $programming_language”.
replies(1): >>43382768 #
chjj[dead post] ◴[] No.43382768[source]
[flagged]
pdimitar ◴[] No.43383969[source]
I am hopping on Rust threads on HN very regularly and I have to tell you my anecdotal experience.

Which is: people complaining about Rust zealots are much more than actual Rust zealots. Thinking of it, I haven't seen a proper Rust zealot on HN for at least a year at this point.

So I don't know, maybe do less cheap digs. Tearing down straw men is pretty boring to watch.

replies(3): >>43385343 #>>43385702 #>>43388717 #
hyperbrainer ◴[] No.43385702[source]
It is not limited to rust zealots or whatever. I have seen this phenomenon of people criticising a certain category for doing something in the comment section on reddit/youtube, but never actually seen the people doing that thing, even browsing the most heavily downvoted comments. Some weird group mentality victimisation.
replies(2): >>43385911 #>>43386274 #
chjj ◴[] No.43386274[source]
> never actually seen the people doing that thing

I'm happy to share then. Here's my most recent encounter with a rustacean: https://x.com/_chjj/status/1829989494298460636

I asked if he/she/they had ever used the unsafe keyword. That was the response I got. It's usually some vile insult involving furry or transgender genitalia.

replies(2): >>43387891 #>>43389997 #
mplanchard ◴[] No.43387891[source]
Do you not think that the thread you’re currently on here on HN has a lot of rust programmers? So your “most recent encounter” is actually this thread.

It’s trivial to find examples of people in any community who are a bit off the rails, but you shouldn’t let that define your perception of the community, especially given the fact that you’re currently in a context where your thesis doesn’t have much to support it.

replies(1): >>43388573 #
chjj ◴[] No.43388573[source]
Fair enough. I suppose it is my most recent encounter. The result: I still don't like the rust community. You may have different opinions. I see no issue here.
replies(2): >>43388738 #>>43390022 #
pdimitar ◴[] No.43388738[source]
I see the issue. Biased people like yourself don't belong in tech.

For the record, I only picked Rust 5-ish years ago out of a 23 years of career. I know plenty of other languages. I was a skeptic at the start as well. Never generalized a pretty big group like you do though.

You should be ashamed.

replies(2): >>43389046 #>>43390513 #
johnisgood ◴[] No.43390513[source]
He should be ashamed because he does not like your community?
replies(1): >>43394427 #
1. pdimitar ◴[] No.43394427[source]
No. He should be ashamed because he generalizes, realizes it, admits it and doubles down on it. That's not objective. That's just being stubborn. I can get those kinds of opinions in the local bar. I come to HN for higher-quality discussions.

And it's not "my" community. I don't belong to a single one so I don't emotionally defend any of them.