←back to thread

Zlib-rs is faster than C

(trifectatech.org)
341 points dochtman | 1 comments | 16 Mar 25 19:35 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
kahlonel ◴[16 Mar 25 20:04 UTC] No.43381785[source]▶
You mean the implementation is faster than the one in C. Because nothing is “faster than C”.
replies(11): >>43381811 #>>43381892 #>>43382209 #>>43382286 #>>43382342 #>>43382418 #>>43382745 #>>43383389 #>>43383690 #>>43384451 #>>43392826 #
cozzyd ◴[17 Mar 25 01:52 UTC] No.43384451[source]▶
Nothing is faster than C in a vacuum, but depending on the context (medium?) that can happen.

In other words, someone should name a language Cerenkov

replies(1): >>43385619 #
oneshtein ◴[17 Mar 25 06:16 UTC] No.43385619[source]▶
Gravitation is slightly faster than c in vacuum.
replies(1): >>43385713 #
hyperbrainer ◴[17 Mar 25 06:36 UTC] No.43385713[source]▶
In GR, the speed of gravitational waves is _exactly equal_ to c.
replies(1): >>43389558 #
oneshtein ◴[17 Mar 25 15:27 UTC] No.43389558[source]▶
In reality, speed of light is slightly lower than speed of gravitation, because gravitation slows down speed of light.
replies(1): >>43390036 #
1. hyperbrainer ◴[17 Mar 25 16:13 UTC] No.43390036[source]▶
We were presumably talking about an ideal massless space [Minkowski] in which the speed of light in a vaccuum is considered -- that is what c is defined as.