←back to thread

319 points modmodmod | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.725s | source
Show context
tracerbulletx ◴[] No.43374959[source]
I kind of wish people would stop making yt-dlp more accessible and increasing Google's desire to shut it down.
replies(14): >>43375203 #>>43375226 #>>43375269 #>>43375318 #>>43375398 #>>43375403 #>>43375436 #>>43376048 #>>43376051 #>>43376303 #>>43376514 #>>43376607 #>>43376772 #>>43377251 #
Gigachad ◴[] No.43375318[source]
Agreed. Youtube downloaders are essential for backup purposes and for getting clips to put in your own videos as fair use. But people turning them in to fully user facing ad free frontends are driving the crackdown on the tools so we will end up with no way at all to download videos..

Would be nice if Youtube just let premium users download the actual video files. What I find interesting is how so many of the Chinese social media platforms just let you download videos while western tech companies pretty much universally block it.

replies(3): >>43375904 #>>43375934 #>>43376159 #
999900000999 ◴[] No.43376159[source]
> how so many of the Chinese social media platforms just let you download videos

The rate things are going I’ll just have to use those sites instead.

YouTube is a weird position. A lot of content is public domain and should be freely downloaded. Other content isn’t.

A good middle ground would be for YouTube to just give uploaders an option to enable downloads.

I do agree that people need to STOP trying to make yt-dl easy to use to the point it actually competes with YouTube. YouTube Red when you factor in music is a very good deal. I’ve been subscribed for years.

Like it or not but YouTube is almost entirely funded by ads. You don’t have a right to use the service without paying.

replies(6): >>43376203 #>>43376591 #>>43378144 #>>43378618 #>>43379007 #>>43382217 #
littlestymaar ◴[] No.43382217{3}[source]
> YouTube is a weird position. A lot of content is public domain and should be freely downloaded. Other content isn’t.

It depends on the jurisdiction actually. In mine (France) and a few others, the right to save material is granted to every citizen no matter the license of the said material as long as the copy is made for private use only (it's called «droit à la copie privée» which translates to “right to private copy”).

replies(2): >>43382989 #>>43383205 #
999900000999 ◴[] No.43383205[source]
Does this mandate American companies provide a mechanism for a personal copy ?

In theory YouTube could geo lock these features if made to implement it.

replies(1): >>43383395 #
1. littlestymaar ◴[] No.43383395[source]
No, unfortunately, and DRMs are still legal. Which is a shame given that we have to pay a tax to the copyright industry whenever we buy a storage media (be it an SD card or an HDD) in exchange for this right…

What I mean is that there's no legal reason for Youtube to prevent downloading their videos (they can't be sued by IP holders for providing a download link for that matter).

replies(1): >>43384589 #
2. 999900000999 ◴[] No.43384589[source]
So does that mean if you watch Netflix in Canada or France you can send a letter requesting a copy of their media ?

It seems like a good idea, Bojack Horseman is probably going to be taken down at some point, but enforcement remains elusive.

replies(1): >>43386141 #
3. littlestymaar ◴[] No.43386141[source]
You can send them a letter, and they can comply without infringing any agreement made with the copyright holder, but they don't have to.