←back to thread

319 points modmodmod | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
tracerbulletx ◴[] No.43374959[source]
I kind of wish people would stop making yt-dlp more accessible and increasing Google's desire to shut it down.
replies(14): >>43375203 #>>43375226 #>>43375269 #>>43375318 #>>43375398 #>>43375403 #>>43375436 #>>43376048 #>>43376051 #>>43376303 #>>43376514 #>>43376607 #>>43376772 #>>43377251 #
nadermx ◴[] No.43376303[source]
Not sure it was ever youtubes desire to shut it down. Why would they, as there are a multitude of reasons why someone would want a video off a platform. It was the RIAA's, since there the ones who sent the takedown.
replies(1): >>43376456 #
thomassmith65 ◴[] No.43376456[source]
This year AlphaGoogle has an initiative to kill ad-blockers. To that end, Youtube now aborts playback after 60 seconds if it cannot contact its ad server to play commercials.

It's clear where this is heading:

1) Youtube will go after software like yt-dlp to ensure only AlphaGoogle-sanctioned players can play its videos

2) Youtube will encode commercials directly into the videos it streams

Both will come to pass. It's not 'if' but 'when'

replies(2): >>43376494 #>>43379583 #
1. CuriouslyC ◴[] No.43379583[source]
And we'll have middleware that detects and splices out commercials based on frame fingerprints not long after. People hate ads.

It'll definitely trouble the non-technical set though.

replies(1): >>43384414 #
2. thomassmith65 ◴[] No.43384414[source]
I look forward to the day (if it ever comes) that on-device AI is powerful enough to identify commercials in podcasts and splice them out.