←back to thread

319 points modmodmod | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.388s | source
Show context
tracerbulletx ◴[] No.43374959[source]
I kind of wish people would stop making yt-dlp more accessible and increasing Google's desire to shut it down.
replies(14): >>43375203 #>>43375226 #>>43375269 #>>43375318 #>>43375398 #>>43375403 #>>43375436 #>>43376048 #>>43376051 #>>43376303 #>>43376514 #>>43376607 #>>43376772 #>>43377251 #
1. modmodmod ◴[] No.43375436[source]
so, essentially, what you are saying is that yt-dlp should have never been open-sourced/published and ever posted on HN (so that not even you would have found out about it)?
replies(3): >>43375675 #>>43376385 #>>43376968 #
2. codetrotter ◴[] No.43375675[source]
No no. He’s saying that only people with his exact amount of technical skill and prowess deserves yt-dlp. If you for some reason are not knowledgable about cli tools, then that is the exact, natural, universal, god given reason that you do not deserve yt-dlp.

In order to ensure that not too many people learn about yt-dlp, we should also work to remove all access to knowledge about the magical super big brain requiring, mytical command line.

In fact to ensure that Google does not kill yt-dlp, everyone in the world except tracerbulletx should be force fed chemical powder that makes them stupid.

That way, only tracerbulletx will understand yt-dlp, and he can heroically guard this super secret tool that only those worthy deserves to know.

replies(3): >>43375781 #>>43376218 #>>43376609 #
3. modmodmod ◴[] No.43375781[source]
lol so poetical
4. compootr ◴[] No.43376609[source]
I think mister tracerbulletx has drank the stupid juice. its not a problem with developers (and products/apps the developers make), it's with google, not allowing downloads even when you pay a subscription
5. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.43376968[source]
They're not talking about yt-dlp itself though.

But if they were, they probably would agree that it never should have been posted to HN, not even the first time they saw it on HN.

Not publishing at all would obviously be incorrect. You know they're not saying that.