←back to thread

300 points proberts | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.22s | source

I'll be here for the next 6 hours. As usual, there are countless possible topics and I'll be guided by whatever you're concerned with but as much as possible I'd like to focus on the recent changes and potential changes in U.S. immigration law, policy, and practice. Please remember that I am limited in providing legal advice on specific cases for obvious liability reasons because I won't have access to all the facts. Please stick to a factual discussion in your questions and comments and I'll try to do the same in my responses. Thank you!
Show context
fuzztail ◴[] No.43363226[source]
I've seen recent examples of the government targeting green card holders for their speech. As a naturalized citizen who wants to exercise my free speech rights, how concerned should I be about potentially having my citizenship challenged on technical grounds? Are there realistic scenarios where this could happen despite First Amendment protections?
replies(7): >>43363243 #>>43363333 #>>43363705 #>>43363935 #>>43365810 #>>43368434 #>>43369456 #
mc32[dead post] ◴[] No.43363333[source]
[flagged]
netdevphoenix[dead post] ◴[] No.43363433[source]
[flagged]
dragonwriter ◴[] No.43363483[source]
GC holders are permanent resident aliens, not naturalized citizens. Yes, thet went through a legal process, but citizenship is further down the road of that process.
replies(1): >>43366944 #
Natsu ◴[] No.43366944[source]
Correct. One has to file an N-400 to get naturalized after obtaining LPR ("green card") status.
replies(1): >>43372525 #
1. trollbridge ◴[] No.43372525[source]
Which you can do 3 years after marriage (in the case of Khalifa), and it’s recommended to do so.

The main reason people don’t is because they don’t want to be filing U.S. tax returns the rest of their life if they plan to eventually move back to another country. I have relatives who have made such a decision.