←back to thread

151 points jcartw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.359s | source
Show context
roenxi ◴[] No.43315009[source]
I'm pretty open to the idea that their crypto experiment ended in failure because bitcoin must be a truly terrible reserve asset, but being assassinated by the IMF isn't really evidence of that. El Salvador doesn't seem to have independently changed their minds about the merits of their policy.

I might draw a very vague parallel with a gentleman who can't repay a mortgage and through various machinations the bank forces him to sell his beanie baby collection. The beanie baby collection might have been a success or a failure for him personally. Probably was a failure. But that isn't really what we're learning in this story.

And pointing out that they lose money on the bitcoin reserve is a bit of a non-sequiter. They all do that. Gold has storage costs, the USD inflates like crazy and sometimes the US sanctions you. The analysis has to be a bit deeper than just noting that money was lost, it is a tricky question of relative options.

replies(8): >>43315089 #>>43315194 #>>43315310 #>>43315529 #>>43315688 #>>43316682 #>>43316727 #>>43321466 #
tptacek ◴[] No.43315089[source]
The article makes a case on the merits for the failure of the project, in terms of its uptake, the direct value generated, and the costs of its rollout.
replies(2): >>43315172 #>>43316240 #
roenxi ◴[] No.43315172[source]
Those arguments could be levelled against any currency. Typically uptake is only 100% because the government has a "thou shalt accept this" policy. If it was practically voluntary then a bunch of businesses would operate on a barter system or private scrip. Even with the insistence of the tax office it takes regular crackdowns to stop alternatives springing up.

And it is even easy to argue that normal currency is value destructive, all the flows of money into crypto are implicit "I'd rather be burning energy than using USD" announcements.

replies(3): >>43315236 #>>43315257 #>>43315757 #
SpicyLemonZest ◴[] No.43315757[source]
The Salvadoran government did have a "thou shalt accept this" policy, in addition to exempting bitcoin holdings from capital gains tax. It worked to drive initial interest, with a quarter of Salvadorans using Bitcoin for at least some transactions in 2021, but adoption fell sharply over time. I haven't studied it in depth, but my vague understanding is that many businesses couldn't actually figure out how to practically accept Bitcoin despite being theoretically required to.
replies(2): >>43329472 #>>43329596 #
1. Ferret7446 ◴[] No.43329472[source]
Which isn't surprising. Bitcoin is unfortunately not well suited for petty transactions, even though it shines as a truly neutral platform for larger transactions. They should have tried to implement something like Lightning nationwide; some of Lightning's flaws could be overcome with government investment/buy-in.