←back to thread

151 points jcartw | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.208s | source
Show context
roenxi ◴[] No.43315009[source]
I'm pretty open to the idea that their crypto experiment ended in failure because bitcoin must be a truly terrible reserve asset, but being assassinated by the IMF isn't really evidence of that. El Salvador doesn't seem to have independently changed their minds about the merits of their policy.

I might draw a very vague parallel with a gentleman who can't repay a mortgage and through various machinations the bank forces him to sell his beanie baby collection. The beanie baby collection might have been a success or a failure for him personally. Probably was a failure. But that isn't really what we're learning in this story.

And pointing out that they lose money on the bitcoin reserve is a bit of a non-sequiter. They all do that. Gold has storage costs, the USD inflates like crazy and sometimes the US sanctions you. The analysis has to be a bit deeper than just noting that money was lost, it is a tricky question of relative options.

replies(8): >>43315089 #>>43315194 #>>43315310 #>>43315529 #>>43315688 #>>43316682 #>>43316727 #>>43321466 #
tptacek ◴[] No.43315089[source]
The article makes a case on the merits for the failure of the project, in terms of its uptake, the direct value generated, and the costs of its rollout.
replies(2): >>43315172 #>>43316240 #
1. Lerc ◴[] No.43316240[source]
I don't know, they say that they're up $250M but the total cost of the program was $375M. I presume the bulk of that $375 went into the $30 incentive balance. That amounts to quite an economic stimulus for cheap.

All in all, El Salvador has been doing pretty well economically. It's human rights that have been the worrying point.