←back to thread

151 points jcartw | 5 comments | | HN request time: 0.806s | source
Show context
dexter0 ◴[] No.43314816[source]
Key points:

> Despite these profits, crypto has brought El Salvador more costs than benefits. The free publicity has been welcome, yet crypto-investment and crypto-tourism have been small beer. Gains in financial inclusion and from more efficient payments are meagre at best: the currency never really caught on. In 2022, when the hype was at its peak, a survey by CID-Gallup found that only a fifth of firms accepted bitcoin and just 5% of tax payments were in crypto.

> Moreover, the policy cost $375m in all—from the Chivo rollout, subsidised transaction fees, bitcoin ATMs and more—according to Moody’s, a rating agency. That far exceeds the profits on bitcoin holdings, which could still evaporate. By delaying an IMF deal, the crypto experiment kept El Salvador’s risk premium high.

replies(2): >>43315177 #>>43315223 #
1. Loughla ◴[] No.43315177[source]
So this was just a way to shift more public dollars into private hands?
replies(3): >>43315308 #>>43315317 #>>43315411 #
2. horrible-hilde ◴[] No.43315308[source]
yes
3. ◴[] No.43315317[source]
4. dgfitz ◴[] No.43315411[source]
The bulk of BTC is owned by like 50 people. It’s such a fucking joke.
replies(1): >>43321645 #
5. blitzar ◴[] No.43321645[source]
and 20 of them lost the keys to those BTC 10 years ago