←back to thread

817 points dynm | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.312s | source
Show context
discodonkey ◴[] No.43306858[source]
For a community that prides itself on critical thinking, I'm always surprised to see HN lap this sort of pseudoscientific witch-doctor stuff up.

This poorly-controlled, N=1 experiment tells you nothing, not even about the author.

There's absolutely no reason to consider these novice self-experiments when professional scientific experiments are available (unless you're hunting for a specific result).

replies(6): >>43306867 #>>43306891 #>>43306907 #>>43306926 #>>43307113 #>>43307178 #
defen ◴[] No.43306867[source]
The author directly quoted the European Food Safety Authority, who found the same thing he did. There's a rich history of self-experimentation in medicine and nutrition, I don't think you need to be so negative.
replies(1): >>43307117 #
1. discodonkey ◴[] No.43307117[source]
My point was that no data gleaned from this experiment would've been meaningful, regardless of the result, because it was not conducted very rigourously.and on a sufficiently large scale.