/top/
/new/
/best/
/ask/
/show/
/job/
^
slacker news
login
about
←back to thread
It is hard to recommend Python in production
(ashishb.net)
33 points
ashishb
| 6 comments |
08 Mar 25 05:14 UTC
|
HN request time: 0s
|
source
|
bottom
1.
darthrupert
◴[
08 Mar 25 07:04 UTC
]
No.
43298148
[source]
▶
>>43297671 (OP)
#
Now that Rust exists and llm can easily lift a more junior person over the initially difficult parts, there are not many things you should use python for.
replies(1):
>>43298193
#
ID:
GO
2.
randomNumber7
◴[
08 Mar 25 07:10 UTC
]
No.
43298193
[source]
▶
>>43298148 (TP)
#
Now that AI based verification exists, I can just write C again and call it a day.
replies(2):
>>43298504
#
>>43298947
#
3.
darthrupert
◴[
08 Mar 25 08:14 UTC
]
No.
43298504
[source]
▶
>>43298193
#
That's false even as a joke. C is less safe than either of python or Rust and has no benefits against Rust.
replies(1):
>>43298537
#
4.
ashishb
◴[
08 Mar 25 08:23 UTC
]
No.
43298537
{3}
[source]
▶
>>43298504
#
> C is less safe than either of python or Rust and has no benefits against Rust.
Indeed.
5.
timeon
◴[
08 Mar 25 10:06 UTC
]
No.
43298947
[source]
▶
>>43298193
#
I wonder if Rust or C would decrease need for power use while training those models.
replies(1):
>>43329719
#
6.
ashishb
◴[
11 Mar 25 06:27 UTC
]
No.
43329719
{3}
[source]
▶
>>43298947
#
It definitely will. Whether it will make a noticable difference depends on how much non-cuda work happens in model training.
↑