←back to thread

340 points jbornhorst | 9 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source | bottom

I’m digging into an idea around eyeglasses, screen-time, and vision discomfort. If you wear prescription glasses but still get headaches, eye strain, or blurry vision after long screen days, I’d love to chat briefly (20–30 min).

Pure research, zero selling.

Interested? Drop a comment below or email me directly at jbornhorst [at] gmail.com. I’ll coordinate a convenient time to talk.

Show context
bmurphy1976 ◴[] No.43292191[source]
Yes, I'm very nearsighted. I've worn progressive lenses for years but they continue to drive me crazy. I can see fine with them, but my eyes easily get fatigued and I have to take long breaks to get them to calm down.

Over the summer I added a pair of progressive occupational lenses (not reading glasses). They are focused arms length in front of me. This has been a complete game changer. I can now see my monitor crisply, clearly, and easily in a way that I haven't seen it in a decade.

When I swap back and forth between my regular lenses and my occupational lenses, the difference is stark. With my regular lenses there's a part of the screen that's about a half dollar coin in size that's clear and in focus. The rest of the screen is every so slightly blurry. I have to move my head to constantly adjust the focal point, or move my eyes and struggle to focus.

When I switch to my occupational lenses, the entire screen is clear. I don't have to move my head. I don't have to fight to focus. Where I look, it's crisp.

No wonder I was struggling! I was fighting to focus all day long. I suffer from almost no eye fatigue now. If my eyes are tired, it's usually because I'm tired and it's been a long day.

The downside is I now have to juggle two pairs of glasses instead of one, but that's oh so totally been worth it. I'm not going back.

replies(7): >>43292232 #>>43292397 #>>43292613 #>>43292938 #>>43293069 #>>43298922 #>>43299039 #
dinfinity ◴[] No.43292938[source]
Unsure if this will work for your case, but I am _very_ happy with my implanted contact lenses. They sit behind my iris and optically function as normal contact lenses. No hassle, just a straight up body upgrade.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intraocular_lens

I was very surprised that this is not a more common thing to hear about amongst people with bad eyesight. Laser correction sucks in comparison, with more risks of complications, generally worse vision outcomes, longer recovery, etc. The lens implantation process is even undoable and as safe as cataract surgery which has been done since the 1970s.

replies(3): >>43293018 #>>43294630 #>>43295226 #
bmurphy1976 ◴[] No.43293018[source]
Honestly, I'm absolutely terrified of doing anything that might damage my eyesight. I know the common procedures (i.e. Lasik) have come a long way in the last two decades and are very low risk, but they are not zero risk. I won't even wear contact lenses, I long ago fully committed to glasses. That type of procedure doesn't fit my risk tolerance.
replies(3): >>43294406 #>>43298281 #>>43324834 #
1. dinfinity ◴[] No.43294406[source]
I understand the hesitation, but that's the thing about this: It's even simpler than cataract surgery (where they actually _replace_ your own lenses instead of just flopping one in front of it), which is very very common, and very very safe.

See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_cataract_surgery

IIRC the chance of complications for Lasik is about 10x that of the one for intraocular lens implantation. The nature of the complications for the latter is also more along the lines of "an eye infection for a month" instead of something permanent.

I definitely suggest researching it (and not mentally lumping it in with Lasik, because they are quite different). Cheesy, but my only regret is not having done it years sooner.

replies(4): >>43294703 #>>43294930 #>>43295234 #>>43295329 #
2. hollerith ◴[] No.43294703[source]
>cataract surgery, which is very very common, and very very safe.

Ever since my elderly friend had cataract surgery (5 years ago) she finds bright light painful, so she spends less time outdoors.

replies(1): >>43324846 #
3. fawley ◴[] No.43294930[source]
I perpetually rub/touch my eyes. My big fear around these surgeries is weakening a structure such that damage is more likely.
replies(1): >>43299431 #
4. bluGill ◴[] No.43295234[source]
I would still never bifocals or at least reading glasses. Once you reach around 45 everyone day. Lasix probably makes you need them sooner (but we are talking at most a couple years, not very significant)

I get my glasses in ANSI rated safety glasses so wearing glasses all the time doubles as protection from all the things that could get in my eyes. This is useful if you have hobbies where that is a worry, though for most people you are fine without.

replies(1): >>43296851 #
5. ◴[] No.43295329[source]
6. OJFord ◴[] No.43296851[source]
> I would still never bifocals or at least reading glasses. Once you reach around 45 everyone day.

What are the rest of the words? Or the auto'correct'-corrections?

You would still wear* and after 45 everyone does* perhaps?

replies(1): >>43300207 #
7. dustingetz ◴[] No.43299431[source]
you need to stop, that can cause keratokonus

try bandaids on your fingers, it takes 21 days to form a habit. buy a few big boxes, 30 bandaids a day is cheaper than a beer

8. bluGill ◴[] No.43300207{3}[source]
Sigh too late to edit anymore.

never should have been need

9. Suppafly ◴[] No.43324846[source]
> so she spends less time outdoors

Instead of just wearing shades? That's silly.