←back to thread

Hallucinations in code are the least dangerous form of LLM mistakes

(simonwillison.net)
371 points ulrischa | 1 comments | 02 Mar 25 19:15 UTC | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
sevensor ◴[03 Mar 25 10:13 UTC] No.43240261[source]▶
> you have to put a lot of work in to learn how to get good results out of these systems

That certainly punctures the hype. What are LLMs good for, if the best you can hope for is to spend years learning to prompt it for unreliable results?

replies(3): >>43241184 #>>43241373 #>>43242647 #
1. naasking ◴[03 Mar 25 15:27 UTC] No.43242647[source]▶
Because LLMs are not a stationary target, they're only getting better. They're already much better than they were only 2 years ago.