> You can fix that yourself or you can feed the error back into the LLM and watch it correct itself.
Well, those types of errors won't be happening next year will they?
> No amount of meticulous code review—or even comprehensive automated tests—will demonstrably prove that code actually does the right thing. You have to run it yourself!
What rot. The test is the problem definition. If properly expressed, the code passing the test means the code is good.