Hallucinations in code are the least dangerous form of LLM mistakes

> The real risk from using LLMs for code is that they’ll make mistakes that aren’t instantly caught by the language compiler or interpreter. And these happen all the time!

Are these not considered hallucinations still?

I think of hallucinations as instance where an LLM invents something that is entirely untrue - like a class or method that doesn't exist, or a fact about the world that's unnoticed true.

I guess you could call bugs in LLM code "hallucinations", but they feel like a slightly different thing to me.