Hallucinations in code are the least dangerous form of LLM mistakes

    My cynical side suspects they may have been looking for
    a reason to dismiss the technology and jumped at the first
    one they found.

MY cynical side suggests the author is an LLM fanboi who prefers not to think that hallucinating easy stuff strongly implies hallucinating harder stuff, and therefore jumps at the first reason to dismiss the criticism.

What do you mean by "harder stuff"? What about an experimental DSL written in C with a recursive descent parser and a web server runtime that includes Lua, jq, a Postgres connection pool, mustache templates, request-based memory arena, database migrations and much more? 11,000+ lines of code with ~90% written by Claude in Cursor Composer.

https://github.com/williamcotton/webdsl

Frankly us "fanbois" are just a little sick and tired of being told that we must be terrible developers working on simple toys if we find any value from these tools!

I'm a strong believer that LLMs are tools and when wielded by talented and experienced developers they are somewhere in the danger category of Stack Overflow and transitive dependencies. This is not a critique of your project, or really the quality of LLMs, but when I see 90% of a 11,000+ loc project written in Claude, it just feels sort of depressing in a way I haven't processed yet.

I love foss, I love browsing projects of all quality levels and vintages and seeing how things were built. I love learning new patterns and sometimes even bickering over their strengths and weaknesses. An LLM generated code base hardly makes me even want to engage with it...

Perhaps these feelings are somewhat analogous to hardcopies vs ebooks? My opinions have changed over time and I read and collect both. Have you had similar thoughts and gotten over them? Do you see tools like Claude in a way where this isn't an issue?