←back to thread

172 points ToJans | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
lacoolj ◴[] No.43118558[source]
So I guess we're just about 2 or 3 iterations away from no longer being able to trust video as evidence in a courtroom. Just gotta fix the lighting and facial issues and bam! Precedent will be set.
replies(5): >>43118990 #>>43119754 #>>43120129 #>>43120378 #>>43222513 #
1. qingcharles ◴[] No.43222513[source]
No video is accepted into evidence without "laying a foundation" which generally requires a person to swear under oath that the video "is what it says it is", i.e. it is authentic.