(www.shadaj.me)

287 points shadaj | 1 comments | 27 Feb 25 16:12 UTC | HN request time: 0.204s | source

Show context

hinkley ◴[27 Feb 25 18:20 UTC] No.43196932[source]▶

>>43195702 (OP) #

I don’t think there’s anyone in the Elixir community who wouldn’t love it if companies would figure out that everyone is writing software that contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Erlang, and start hiring Elixir or Gleam devs.

The future is here, but it is not evenly distributed.

replies(6): >>43197011 #>>43197396 #>>43197600 #>>43197702 #>>43200061 #>>43207679 #

ignoramous ◴[27 Feb 25 19:29 UTC] No.43197600[source]▶

>>43196932 #

> writing software that contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, slow implementation of half of Erlang

Since you were at AWS (?), you'd know that Erlang did get its shot at distributed systems there. I'm unsure what went wrong, but if not c/c++, it was all JVM based languages soon after that.

replies(2): >>43197805 #>>43218359 #

1. worthless-trash ◴[01 Mar 25 11:46 UTC] No.43218359[source]▶

>>43197600 #

I have noticed that in corporate, langauges dont fail on technical merit, but its fashion merits.

↑

Distributed systems programming has stalled