←back to thread

169 points flaxxen | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Aurornis ◴[] No.43209537[source]
Important to note that the serotonin theory of depression doesn't have to be strictly true for SSRIs to be effective. People who having passing familiarity with neuroscience often assume that psychiatric medications work by correcting deficiencies, but this isn't true. It's also not accurate to say that SSRIs "give you more serotonin" or any of the other variations on that theme.

Neurotransmitters aren't simple levels in the brain that go up and down, despite how much podcasters and fitness influencers talk about them like that. Neurotransmitter dynamics are complex and the long-term adaptations after taking medications like an SSRI can't be simply described in terms of "levels" going up and down. There are changes in frequency, duration, and movement of Serotonin across synapses that are much more complex. There are also adaptations to the receptors, including auto-receptors which modulate release of neurotransmitters (side note: some newer antidepressants also directly target those autoreceptors with possibly slight improvements in side effect profile).

So keep that in mind when reading anything about the serotonin theory of depression. This is often brought up as a strawman argument to attack SSRIs, but we've known for decades that the serotonin theory of depression never fully explained the situation. We've also known that some conditions like anxiety disorders are associated with increased serotonin activity in parts of the brain, which SSRIs can normalize.

replies(13): >>43209629 #>>43209670 #>>43209853 #>>43209868 #>>43209967 #>>43210081 #>>43212406 #>>43212686 #>>43212736 #>>43213199 #>>43213461 #>>43214117 #>>43221077 #
kittikitti ◴[] No.43209629[source]
You should keep in mind that it's a serotonin hypothesis of depression, as noted in the article. Calling it a theory is unsupported by the science.
replies(3): >>43209711 #>>43213613 #>>43221147 #
Aurornis ◴[] No.43209711[source]
The title of the paper is "The serotonin theory of depression" and it uses the phrase throughout the paper.
replies(1): >>43209890 #
1. kittikitti ◴[] No.43209890[source]
Can you tell me where it referenced it as a theory outside of the headline? It also concluded that there is a lack of evidence for the association so why would the authors call it a theory?
replies(1): >>43210000 #
2. Aurornis ◴[] No.43210000[source]
Use your browser's search function. At least 4 instances throughout the article

> It also concluded that there is a lack of evidence for the association so why would the authors call it a theory?

Read the article. It explains this in the introduction. Click some of the citations.

replies(1): >>43210239 #
3. kittikitti ◴[] No.43210239[source]
"The main areas of serotonin research provide no consistent evidence of there being an association between serotonin and depression, and no support for the hypothesis that depression is caused by lowered serotonin activity or concentrations."

I wouldn't call it a theory especially if you're being semantic about serotonin reuptuke. Perhaps it's you who is using words you don't understand?